Standards
Corrections
When a page here gets a fact wrong, we fix it and record it on this page: what it said, what it says now, and when it changed. 7 corrections so far, newest first.
October 2026
Medicare Part D exceptions · Appeal deadline calculator
What it said. The instructions and calculator used 60 days after receipt for the Part D redetermination and reconsideration filing windows, even though the calculator asked for the date on the notice.
What it says now. Both now use CMS’s 65-calendar-day window from the date on the relevant decision notice. The specific CMS reconsideration guidance is newer than the general Medicare.gov page that still states 60 days for the second appeal. Readers should follow their notice promptly and contact the plan about conflicting instructions.
October 2026
What it said. The site attributed its work to a named individual with an unsupported biography.
What it says now. American GLP is identified as the responsible publisher in visible bylines and structured data. No individual credentials or medical review are claimed.
September 2026
The coverage matrix · Home page · Medicaid
What it said. Each state's Medicaid answer was one hand-set label, and it had been applied two ways. Sixteen states that exclude GLP-1s for weight loss sat under "Covers with conditions", while Ohio, Washington and Utah, with the same rule, sat under "Does not cover". The home page printed "0 of 50 cover" above Minnesota, which covers Saxenda, Wegovy and Zepbound for weight loss.
What it says now. Each state now records two answers separately: does Medicaid pay for weight loss, and can Wegovy or Zepbound be approved for heart risk, MASH or sleep apnea. The label is computed from those two answers everywhere it appears. Every relabeled state was re-read at its own source the same day.
September 2026
What it said. The Wegovy fact did not mention that Kentucky's current criteria also approve it for MASH.
What it says now. The fact now carries the MASH route that the current criteria document adds.
September 2026
The coverage matrix · New York
What it said. The matrix printed "Not published" for every state with no appeal deadline. For four of those states we had not been able to open the state's own rule at all, so we had no basis for saying the state publishes nothing.
What it says now. The matrix now tells the two cases apart: a state whose rules we read and which states no window, and a state whose rule host we could not open. Each state page gives its own reason.
September 2026
What it said. The deadline card said the state's own hearing-rule page "could not be opened". That sentence was written for New York and was false here: both states' rules were read in full.
What it says now. Both pages now say the rules were read and publish no filing window for a pharmacy denial.
September 2026
What it said. A template line said "None of it establishes what your own plan does". That is true of the commercial carriers and false of the federal employee plan, whose brochure is the member's plan document.
What it says now. The federal employee plan page carries its own wording, and the commercial carrier pages are unchanged.
What counts as a correction
A label, a figure or a sentence that was wrong on a live page. A rule that changes on a known date is an update, not a correction, and we write those pages to read true before and after the date. Layout changes and routine re-reads of a source are not listed.
Found something wrong?
Send us the page and the document that says otherwise. We read the source, fix the page if it is wrong and add the change here. Contact the desk · How facts are sourced and labeled.